From gmk at runlevelzero.net Sat Jun 3 22:09:00 2006 From: gmk at runlevelzero.net (Greg M. Kurtzer) Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 22:09:00 -0700 Subject: [cAos] caos3 development Message-ID: <20060604050900.GB14645@aries.runlevelzero.net> The next generation of cAos is in development, here and now! As some of you also know, we are in a position to receive funding for development. However our funding backers (myself included) have been watching our current development emphasis and while we have a very current and maintained Enlightenment stack, we need to also pay as much (and even more) attention to our services and security. To accommodate this, cAos-3 primary emphasis is performance, efficiency, services and security. Our targeted user-base is clustered systems and servers for ISP, home and office. Secondary emphasis will include other more general distribution aspects. The goal is not only to appeal to our potential funders, but also grow into an area to which I have heard various complaints that there isn't a reasonable solution for. While the Linux desktop and general purpose distributions are very important, they also have been solved very well by both commercial and non-commercial organizations. I know everyone is busy, I am as well. However we can not expect to get backed by individuals or other organizations that see very little progress where they need it most or significantly grow our user-base. It is time to focus and get stuff done. At this time, I have the base self hosting development file system nearing completion. From here I will need package maintainers, developers, doc writers, and anyone else that wants to be part of the development group to contact me. I am open to discussing positions for not only guru developers and maintainers, but also newcomers that want to be part of an open source project that many people use. While cAos-2 was a loosely managed project where contributors come and go and commit when they have time, cAos-3 will be much more structured and organized higher emphasis on leadership and chain of command. We will operate more as a unit and as a team bringing a higher level of professionalism to the project. Thus I am looking for people to not only volunteer but also commit to long term maintenance of various aspects of caos3. We have some very intriguing opportunities in-front of us and we need to be more aggressive and focused if we are to reach the next level. Thanks, Greg -- Greg M. Kurtzer http://runlevelzero.net/ http://caosity.org/ http://warewulf-cluster.org/ Do not look anywhere for truth, for all that is needed is to refrain from allowing concepts to arise. From astevens at gravitypark.com Sat Jun 3 22:20:09 2006 From: astevens at gravitypark.com (Arthur Stevens) Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 22:20:09 -0700 Subject: [cAos] caos3 development References: <20060604050900.GB14645@aries.runlevelzero.net> Message-ID: <000601c68796$8cb7d5a0$6600a8c0@astevens> Hallelujah! I could not agree more. Focusing on horsepower and not the cupholders is by far the best decision yet! Arthur ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg M. Kurtzer" To: Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 10:09 PM Subject: [cAos] caos3 development > The next generation of cAos is in development, here and now! > > As some of you also know, we are in a position to receive funding for > development. However our funding backers (myself included) have been > watching our current development emphasis and while we have a very > current and maintained Enlightenment stack, we need to also pay as much > (and even more) attention to our services and security. > > To accommodate this, cAos-3 primary emphasis is performance, efficiency, > services and security. Our targeted user-base is clustered systems and > servers for ISP, home and office. Secondary emphasis will include other > more general distribution aspects. > > The goal is not only to appeal to our potential funders, but also grow > into an area to which I have heard various complaints that there isn't a > reasonable solution for. While the Linux desktop and general purpose > distributions are very important, they also have been solved very well > by both commercial and non-commercial organizations. > > I know everyone is busy, I am as well. However we can not expect to get > backed by individuals or other organizations that see very little > progress where they need it most or significantly grow our user-base. It > is time to focus and get stuff done. > > At this time, I have the base self hosting development file system > nearing completion. From here I will need package maintainers, > developers, doc writers, and anyone else that wants to be part of the > development group to contact me. I am open to discussing positions for > not only guru developers and maintainers, but also newcomers that want > to be part of an open source project that many people use. > > While cAos-2 was a loosely managed project where contributors come and > go and commit when they have time, cAos-3 will be much more structured > and organized higher emphasis on leadership and chain of command. We > will operate more as a unit and as a team bringing a higher level of > professionalism to the project. > > Thus I am looking for people to not only volunteer but also commit to long > term maintenance of various aspects of caos3. We have some very intriguing > opportunities in-front of us and we need to be more aggressive and focused > if we are to reach the next level. > > Thanks, > Greg > -- > Greg M. Kurtzer > http://runlevelzero.net/ > http://caosity.org/ > http://warewulf-cluster.org/ > > Do not look anywhere for truth, for all that is needed is to refrain from > allowing concepts to arise. > _______________________________________________ > cAos mailing list > cAos at caosity.org > http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/caos > From tmattox at gmail.com Sun Jun 4 06:22:47 2006 From: tmattox at gmail.com (Tim Mattox) Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2006 09:22:47 -0400 Subject: [cAos] caos3 development In-Reply-To: <000601c68796$8cb7d5a0$6600a8c0@astevens> References: <20060604050900.GB14645@aries.runlevelzero.net> <000601c68796$8cb7d5a0$6600a8c0@astevens> Message-ID: I second the "Hallelujah!" :-) Although, I may be even less available the rest of June, I should be able to contribute much more starting sometime in July. Why you may ask? First, my wife and I are expecting our first in a week or so... a girl. :-) Second, in July I'll be actively working at my new position at Indiana University in the Open Systems Lab. I'll need to see what my new boss thinks about it, but I might be able to work on aspects of cAos-3 part of my official duties. Either way, I'm on board. For those not familiar with the OSL @ IU, they are the the developers of LAM/MPI and one of the founding members of the Open MPI Team, both of which are key software projects to be included in cAos-3, IMHO. http://www.osl.iu.edu/research.php On 6/4/06, Arthur Stevens wrote: > Hallelujah! > > I could not agree more. Focusing on horsepower and not the cupholders is by > far the best decision yet! > > Arthur -- Tim Mattox - tmattox at gmail.com http://homepage.mac.com/tmattox/ I'm a bright... http://www.the-brights.net/ From m.stolte at datadevil.demon.nl Sun Jun 4 08:34:41 2006 From: m.stolte at datadevil.demon.nl (m.stolte at datadevil.demon.nl) Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2006 17:34:41 +0200 Subject: [cAos] caos3 development In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20060604173441.g67sc3zpueck4ogg@www.webmail.nl.demon.net> Quoting Tim Mattox : > > I second the "Hallelujah!" :-) > > Although, I may be even less available the rest of June, I should be able to > contribute much more starting sometime in July. Why you may ask? > First, my wife and I are expecting our first in a week or so... a girl. :-) > Second, in July I'll be actively working at my new position at Indiana > University in the Open Systems Lab. I'll need to see what my new boss > thinks about it, but I might be able to work on aspects of cAos-3 part of > my official duties. Either way, I'm on board. Good to have you onboard Tim. > > For those not familiar with the OSL @ IU, they are the the developers of > LAM/MPI and one of the founding members of the Open MPI Team, both > of which are key software projects to be included in cAos-3, IMHO. > http://www.osl.iu.edu/research.php They sound like a must have to include indeed, altough I'm by no means a cluster expert :-) I'm also going to be available again from july onwards, so hope to see you then! Maarten > > On 6/4/06, Arthur Stevens wrote: >> Hallelujah! >> >> I could not agree more. Focusing on horsepower and not the cupholders is by >> far the best decision yet! >> >> Arthur > > -- > Tim Mattox - tmattox at gmail.com > http://homepage.mac.com/tmattox/ > I'm a bright... http://www.the-brights.net/ > _______________________________________________ > cAos mailing list > cAos at caosity.org > http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/caos > From linuxtitan at gmail.com Sun Jun 4 19:30:46 2006 From: linuxtitan at gmail.com (Stephen Houston) Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2006 21:30:46 -0500 Subject: [cAos] caos3 development In-Reply-To: <20060604173441.g67sc3zpueck4ogg@www.webmail.nl.demon.net> References: <20060604173441.g67sc3zpueck4ogg@www.webmail.nl.demon.net> Message-ID: <306818890606041930l1aa2a52bh28e0cb01eb3582b5@mail.gmail.com> On 6/4/06, m.stolte at datadevil.demon.nl wrote: > > Quoting Tim Mattox : > > > > > I second the "Hallelujah!" :-) > > > > Although, I may be even less available the rest of June, I should be > able to > > contribute much more starting sometime in July. Why you may ask? > > First, my wife and I are expecting our first in a week or so... a girl. > :-) > > Second, in July I'll be actively working at my new position at Indiana > > University in the Open Systems Lab. I'll need to see what my new boss > > thinks about it, but I might be able to work on aspects of cAos-3 part > of > > my official duties. Either way, I'm on board. > > Good to have you onboard Tim. > > > > > For those not familiar with the OSL @ IU, they are the the developers of > > LAM/MPI and one of the founding members of the Open MPI Team, both > > of which are key software projects to be included in cAos-3, IMHO. > > http://www.osl.iu.edu/research.php > > They sound like a must have to include indeed, altough I'm by no means > a cluster > expert :-) > > I'm also going to be available again from july onwards, so hope to see > you then! > > Maarten > > > > > On 6/4/06, Arthur Stevens wrote: > >> Hallelujah! > >> > >> I could not agree more. Focusing on horsepower and not the cupholders > is by > >> far the best decision yet! > >> > >> Arthur > > > > -- > > Tim Mattox - tmattox at gmail.com > > http://homepage.mac.com/tmattox/ > > I'm a bright... http://www.the-brights.net/ > > _______________________________________________ > > cAos mailing list > > cAos at caosity.org > > http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/caos > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > cAos mailing list > cAos at caosity.org > http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/caos > Ok. After consideration, I can really see this project is going somewhere big. Greg is someone you can definetly put trust in and Arthur is someone that will beat you up if you don't, so how can I say no? On a more serious work. Work has begin including some that I have done, and the technology of caos 3 is going to be really great, boosting our popularity without a doubt. This is definetly a project to be involved in. -- Stephen Houston -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.infiscale.org/pipermail/caos/attachments/20060604/e09c436b/attachment.html From glen at callident.com Mon Jun 5 12:31:54 2006 From: glen at callident.com (Glen Otero) Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 12:31:54 -0700 Subject: [cAos] caos3 development In-Reply-To: <20060604050900.GB14645@aries.runlevelzero.net> References: <20060604050900.GB14645@aries.runlevelzero.net> Message-ID: <5FAD211E-CC25-48BA-AB6A-0478EBB10337@callident.com> Greg- I'd like to help with cAos-3 development, but not sure what the best way to contribute is. Any suggestions? Glen On Jun 3, 2006, at 10:09 PM, Greg M. Kurtzer wrote: > The next generation of cAos is in development, here and now! > > As some of you also know, we are in a position to receive funding for > development. However our funding backers (myself included) have been > watching our current development emphasis and while we have a very > current and maintained Enlightenment stack, we need to also pay as > much > (and even more) attention to our services and security. > > To accommodate this, cAos-3 primary emphasis is performance, > efficiency, > services and security. Our targeted user-base is clustered systems and > servers for ISP, home and office. Secondary emphasis will include > other > more general distribution aspects. > > The goal is not only to appeal to our potential funders, but also grow > into an area to which I have heard various complaints that there > isn't a > reasonable solution for. While the Linux desktop and general purpose > distributions are very important, they also have been solved very well > by both commercial and non-commercial organizations. > > I know everyone is busy, I am as well. However we can not expect to > get > backed by individuals or other organizations that see very little > progress where they need it most or significantly grow our user- > base. It > is time to focus and get stuff done. > > At this time, I have the base self hosting development file system > nearing completion. From here I will need package maintainers, > developers, doc writers, and anyone else that wants to be part of the > development group to contact me. I am open to discussing positions for > not only guru developers and maintainers, but also newcomers that want > to be part of an open source project that many people use. > > While cAos-2 was a loosely managed project where contributors come and > go and commit when they have time, cAos-3 will be much more structured > and organized higher emphasis on leadership and chain of command. We > will operate more as a unit and as a team bringing a higher level of > professionalism to the project. > > Thus I am looking for people to not only volunteer but also commit > to long > term maintenance of various aspects of caos3. We have some very > intriguing > opportunities in-front of us and we need to be more aggressive and > focused > if we are to reach the next level. > > Thanks, > Greg > -- > Greg M. Kurtzer > http://runlevelzero.net/ > http://caosity.org/ > http://warewulf-cluster.org/ > > Do not look anywhere for truth, for all that is needed is to > refrain from > allowing concepts to arise. > _______________________________________________ > cAos mailing list > cAos at caosity.org > http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/caos > From gmk at runlevelzero.net Mon Jun 5 12:56:31 2006 From: gmk at runlevelzero.net (Greg M. Kurtzer) Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 12:56:31 -0700 Subject: [cAos] caos3 development In-Reply-To: References: <20060604050900.GB14645@aries.runlevelzero.net> <000601c68796$8cb7d5a0$6600a8c0@astevens> Message-ID: <20060605195631.GA13146@aries.runlevelzero.net> On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 09:22:47AM -0400, Tim Mattox wrote: > I second the "Hallelujah!" :-) > > Although, I may be even less available the rest of June, I should be able to > contribute much more starting sometime in July. Why you may ask? > First, my wife and I are expecting our first in a week or so... a girl. :-) > Second, in July I'll be actively working at my new position at Indiana > University in the Open Systems Lab. I'll need to see what my new boss > thinks about it, but I might be able to work on aspects of cAos-3 part of > my official duties. Either way, I'm on board. Congratulations, and great news on the position at IU! We will have multiple ways of installing and building various HPC applications. This is because while RPM is definatly the easiest and most commonly used for standard solutions, most clusters and truly high performance systems are not "standard" (eg. they use custom or specialized compilers and math libraries). So cAos-3 will also be putting more focus into our "ports" tree for these applications making it very simple for people to build or customize many of these packages. We will need maintainers for both of these. :) > For those not familiar with the OSL @ IU, they are the the developers of > LAM/MPI and one of the founding members of the Open MPI Team, both > of which are key software projects to be included in cAos-3, IMHO. > http://www.osl.iu.edu/research.php Very much so. :) Thanks, and I look forward to seeing ya in July! :) > On 6/4/06, Arthur Stevens wrote: > > Hallelujah! > > > > I could not agree more. Focusing on horsepower and not the cupholders is by > > far the best decision yet! > > > > Arthur > > -- > Tim Mattox - tmattox at gmail.com > http://homepage.mac.com/tmattox/ > I'm a bright... http://www.the-brights.net/ > _______________________________________________ > cAos mailing list > cAos at caosity.org > http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/caos -- Greg M. Kurtzer http://runlevelzero.net/ http://caosity.org/ http://warewulf-cluster.org/ Do not look anywhere for truth, for all that is needed is to refrain from allowing concepts to arise. From gmk at runlevelzero.net Mon Jun 5 13:22:48 2006 From: gmk at runlevelzero.net (Greg M. Kurtzer) Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 13:22:48 -0700 Subject: [cAos] caos3 development In-Reply-To: <5FAD211E-CC25-48BA-AB6A-0478EBB10337@callident.com> References: <20060604050900.GB14645@aries.runlevelzero.net> <5FAD211E-CC25-48BA-AB6A-0478EBB10337@callident.com> Message-ID: <20060605202248.GB13146@aries.runlevelzero.net> If my memory serves me right,... you just happen to be one of the worlds leading experts on computational genomics and bio-informatics. :) Lets start there if that works for you. :) Can you provide a list of the freely available bio-informatics code that you would be interested in maintaining and their dependencies (eg. web based frontends may require, apache2, php5, perl, python, *sql, etc..). Thanks! On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 12:31:54PM -0700, Glen Otero wrote: > Greg- > > I'd like to help with cAos-3 development, but not sure what the best > way to contribute is. Any suggestions? > > Glen > > On Jun 3, 2006, at 10:09 PM, Greg M. Kurtzer wrote: > > > The next generation of cAos is in development, here and now! > > > > As some of you also know, we are in a position to receive funding for > > development. However our funding backers (myself included) have been > > watching our current development emphasis and while we have a very > > current and maintained Enlightenment stack, we need to also pay as > > much > > (and even more) attention to our services and security. > > > > To accommodate this, cAos-3 primary emphasis is performance, > > efficiency, > > services and security. Our targeted user-base is clustered systems and > > servers for ISP, home and office. Secondary emphasis will include > > other > > more general distribution aspects. > > > > The goal is not only to appeal to our potential funders, but also grow > > into an area to which I have heard various complaints that there > > isn't a > > reasonable solution for. While the Linux desktop and general purpose > > distributions are very important, they also have been solved very well > > by both commercial and non-commercial organizations. > > > > I know everyone is busy, I am as well. However we can not expect to > > get > > backed by individuals or other organizations that see very little > > progress where they need it most or significantly grow our user- > > base. It > > is time to focus and get stuff done. > > > > At this time, I have the base self hosting development file system > > nearing completion. From here I will need package maintainers, > > developers, doc writers, and anyone else that wants to be part of the > > development group to contact me. I am open to discussing positions for > > not only guru developers and maintainers, but also newcomers that want > > to be part of an open source project that many people use. > > > > While cAos-2 was a loosely managed project where contributors come and > > go and commit when they have time, cAos-3 will be much more structured > > and organized higher emphasis on leadership and chain of command. We > > will operate more as a unit and as a team bringing a higher level of > > professionalism to the project. > > > > Thus I am looking for people to not only volunteer but also commit > > to long > > term maintenance of various aspects of caos3. We have some very > > intriguing > > opportunities in-front of us and we need to be more aggressive and > > focused > > if we are to reach the next level. > > > > Thanks, > > Greg > > -- > > Greg M. Kurtzer > > http://runlevelzero.net/ > > http://caosity.org/ > > http://warewulf-cluster.org/ > > > > Do not look anywhere for truth, for all that is needed is to > > refrain from > > allowing concepts to arise. > > _______________________________________________ > > cAos mailing list > > cAos at caosity.org > > http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/caos > > > > _______________________________________________ > cAos mailing list > cAos at caosity.org > http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/caos -- Greg M. Kurtzer http://runlevelzero.net/ http://caosity.org/ http://warewulf-cluster.org/ Do not look anywhere for truth, for all that is needed is to refrain from allowing concepts to arise. From slaton at OCF.Berkeley.EDU Mon Jun 5 14:01:17 2006 From: slaton at OCF.Berkeley.EDU (slaton) Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 14:01:17 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [cAos] caos3 development In-Reply-To: <20060605195631.GA13146@aries.runlevelzero.net> References: <20060604050900.GB14645@aries.runlevelzero.net> <000601c68796$8cb7d5a0$6600a8c0@astevens> <20060605195631.GA13146@aries.runlevelzero.net> Message-ID: Hi Greg, Allow me to add my congrats as well... :) I also hope to find a way to help out with cAos3. Your comment about the increased focus on ports for cAos3 is interesting. What will the ports position be w/r/t open source HPC applications built with commercial compilers? Would i be welcome to maintain ports built with with architecture-specific commercial compilers (e.g., PathScale for x86_64, Portland for x86, etc)? Or is this too much of a stretch for an open source linux distro... regards slaton Slaton Lipscomb Nogales Lab, Howard Hughes Medical Institute http://cryoem.berkeley.edu From gmk at runlevelzero.net Mon Jun 5 22:21:31 2006 From: gmk at runlevelzero.net (Greg M. Kurtzer) Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 22:21:31 -0700 Subject: [cAos] caos3 development In-Reply-To: References: <20060604050900.GB14645@aries.runlevelzero.net> <000601c68796$8cb7d5a0$6600a8c0@astevens> <20060605195631.GA13146@aries.runlevelzero.net> Message-ID: <20060606052131.GA13540@aries.runlevelzero.net> On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 02:01:17PM -0700, slaton wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Allow me to add my congrats as well... :) > > I also hope to find a way to help out with cAos3. Excellent. :) > Your comment about the increased focus on ports for cAos3 is interesting. > What will the ports position be w/r/t open source HPC applications built > with commercial compilers? Would i be welcome to maintain ports built with > with architecture-specific commercial compilers (e.g., PathScale for > x86_64, Portland for x86, etc)? Or is this too much of a stretch for an > open source linux distro... There are two paths forward. The first is maintaining compiler specific Makefiles within the ports tree. There is no issue at all to have these available for each compiler commercial or non-commercial. The ports tree is responsible for downloading and building the applications (eg. not binary downloads) and can automatcially provide the correct options to configure against the specified compilers. We will check to see if there are any limitations of redistribution of the binaries produced with these compilers. I seem to remember that the PGI compilers will (even with -static) dynamically include a PGI specific library which is under a non-distributable license. Which means that whoever uses it on the other side may also need to purchase the compilers (which I think is fair). I don't think this is the case with Intel's compilers, and I don't remember with Pathscale either. They may have other (non physical) barriers or restrictions for doing this though. Distributing the binaries doesn't conflict with any open source ethical issues of mine, and considering that most of the HPC applications are BSD licensed, there will not be any application licensing restrictions (I need to check with the GPL licensed apps, but I think we are clear there too). If there are compiler restrictions, we will need to go with the first option (using the ports tree). Thanks, Greg -- Greg M. Kurtzer http://runlevelzero.net/ http://caosity.org/ http://warewulf-cluster.org/ Do not look anywhere for truth, for all that is needed is to refrain from allowing concepts to arise. From glen at callident.com Tue Jun 6 06:33:14 2006 From: glen at callident.com (Glen Otero) Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 06:33:14 -0700 Subject: [cAos] caos3 development In-Reply-To: <20060605202248.GB13146@aries.runlevelzero.net> References: <20060604050900.GB14645@aries.runlevelzero.net> <5FAD211E-CC25-48BA-AB6A-0478EBB10337@callident.com> <20060605202248.GB13146@aries.runlevelzero.net> Message-ID: <24EDB547-9533-4603-A818-0C0AE3703C53@callident.com> On Jun 5, 2006, at 1:22 PM, Greg M. Kurtzer wrote: > If my memory serves me right,... you just happen to be one of the > worlds > leading experts on computational genomics and bio-informatics. :) > > Lets start there if that works for you. :) Works for me. > > Can you provide a list of the freely available bio-informatics code > that > you would be interested in maintaining and their dependencies (eg. web > based frontends may require, apache2, php5, perl, python, *sql, > etc..). Will do. These packages aren't included in any Linux distro (obviously), so how will they be organized within cAos? Will groups of other domain-specific packages be compiled as well? Glen > > Thanks! > > On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 12:31:54PM -0700, Glen Otero wrote: >> Greg- >> >> I'd like to help with cAos-3 development, but not sure what the best >> way to contribute is. Any suggestions? >> >> Glen >> >> On Jun 3, 2006, at 10:09 PM, Greg M. Kurtzer wrote: >> >>> The next generation of cAos is in development, here and now! >>> >>> As some of you also know, we are in a position to receive funding >>> for >>> development. However our funding backers (myself included) have been >>> watching our current development emphasis and while we have a very >>> current and maintained Enlightenment stack, we need to also pay as >>> much >>> (and even more) attention to our services and security. >>> >>> To accommodate this, cAos-3 primary emphasis is performance, >>> efficiency, >>> services and security. Our targeted user-base is clustered >>> systems and >>> servers for ISP, home and office. Secondary emphasis will include >>> other >>> more general distribution aspects. >>> >>> The goal is not only to appeal to our potential funders, but also >>> grow >>> into an area to which I have heard various complaints that there >>> isn't a >>> reasonable solution for. While the Linux desktop and general purpose >>> distributions are very important, they also have been solved very >>> well >>> by both commercial and non-commercial organizations. >>> >>> I know everyone is busy, I am as well. However we can not expect to >>> get >>> backed by individuals or other organizations that see very little >>> progress where they need it most or significantly grow our user- >>> base. It >>> is time to focus and get stuff done. >>> >>> At this time, I have the base self hosting development file system >>> nearing completion. From here I will need package maintainers, >>> developers, doc writers, and anyone else that wants to be part of >>> the >>> development group to contact me. I am open to discussing >>> positions for >>> not only guru developers and maintainers, but also newcomers that >>> want >>> to be part of an open source project that many people use. >>> >>> While cAos-2 was a loosely managed project where contributors >>> come and >>> go and commit when they have time, cAos-3 will be much more >>> structured >>> and organized higher emphasis on leadership and chain of command. We >>> will operate more as a unit and as a team bringing a higher level of >>> professionalism to the project. >>> >>> Thus I am looking for people to not only volunteer but also commit >>> to long >>> term maintenance of various aspects of caos3. We have some very >>> intriguing >>> opportunities in-front of us and we need to be more aggressive and >>> focused >>> if we are to reach the next level. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Greg >>> -- >>> Greg M. Kurtzer >>> http://runlevelzero.net/ >>> http://caosity.org/ >>> http://warewulf-cluster.org/ >>> >>> Do not look anywhere for truth, for all that is needed is to >>> refrain from >>> allowing concepts to arise. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cAos mailing list >>> cAos at caosity.org >>> http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/caos >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cAos mailing list >> cAos at caosity.org >> http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/caos > > -- > Greg M. Kurtzer > http://runlevelzero.net/ > http://caosity.org/ > http://warewulf-cluster.org/ > > Do not look anywhere for truth, for all that is needed is to > refrain from > allowing concepts to arise. > _______________________________________________ > cAos mailing list > cAos at caosity.org > http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/caos > From gmk at runlevelzero.net Tue Jun 6 13:29:54 2006 From: gmk at runlevelzero.net (Greg M. Kurtzer) Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 13:29:54 -0700 Subject: [cAos] caos3 development In-Reply-To: <24EDB547-9533-4603-A818-0C0AE3703C53@callident.com> References: <20060604050900.GB14645@aries.runlevelzero.net> <5FAD211E-CC25-48BA-AB6A-0478EBB10337@callident.com> <20060605202248.GB13146@aries.runlevelzero.net> <24EDB547-9533-4603-A818-0C0AE3703C53@callident.com> Message-ID: <20060606202954.GA4861@aries.runlevelzero.net> On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 06:33:14AM -0700, Glen Otero wrote: > > On Jun 5, 2006, at 1:22 PM, Greg M. Kurtzer wrote: > > > If my memory serves me right,... you just happen to be one of the > > worlds > > leading experts on computational genomics and bio-informatics. :) > > > > Lets start there if that works for you. :) > > Works for me. Excellent! :) > > Can you provide a list of the freely available bio-informatics code > > that > > you would be interested in maintaining and their dependencies (eg. web > > based frontends may require, apache2, php5, perl, python, *sql, > > etc..). > > Will do. These packages aren't included in any Linux distro > (obviously), so how will they be organized within cAos? Will groups > of other domain-specific packages be compiled as well? Yes, I believe so. Can you give me an example of some of the packages that you are curious about? Presently we use group directories and ownerships to allow some people access to certain parts of the distro's repository. We can do the same thing here. Maintainers for the dependencies will be decided on by a per case basis. They can be installed via predefined profiles and/or system roles. (does that answer your question?) Thanks! -- Greg M. Kurtzer http://runlevelzero.net/ http://caosity.org/ http://warewulf-cluster.org/ Do not look anywhere for truth, for all that is needed is to refrain from allowing concepts to arise. From gmk at runlevelzero.net Mon Jun 12 18:53:02 2006 From: gmk at runlevelzero.net (Greg M. Kurtzer) Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 18:53:02 -0700 Subject: [cAos] caos2 repository updates Message-ID: <20060613015302.GA18198@aries.runlevelzero.net> Coming soon to a mirror near you: current: + SRPMS/dia-0.94-4.caos.src.rpm + SRPMS/firefox-1.5.0.4-1.caos.src.rpm + SRPMS/MySQL-4.1.20-1.caos.src.rpm + SRPMS/nagios-2.4-1.caos.src.rpm + SRPMS/nmap-4.00-1.caos.src.rpm + SRPMS/perl-Authen-SASL-Cyrus-0.12-1.caos.src.rpm + SRPMS/perl-RDFStore-0.42-1.caos.src.rpm + SRPMS/perl-XML-SAX-0.13-1.caos.src.rpm + SRPMS/postfix-2.2.10-2.caos.src.rpm + SRPMS/qingy-0.8.0-1.caos.src.rpm + SRPMS/scribus-1.3.3.2-1.caos.src.rpm + SRPMS/spamassassin-3.1.3-1.caos.src.rpm - SRPMS/firefox-1.5.0.3-1.caos.src.rpm - SRPMS/openssh-4.2p1-2.caos.src.rpm - SRPMS/php5-5.0.5-5.src.rpm - SRPMS/postfix-2.2.3-2.caos.src.rpm - SRPMS/postfix-2.2.4-1.caos.src.rpm - SRPMS/postfix-2.2.5-1.caos.src.rpm - SRPMS/postfix-2.2.6-1.caos.src.rpm - SRPMS/postfix-2.2.8-1.caos.src.rpm - SRPMS/postfix-2.2.9-1.caos.src.rpm - SRPMS/postfix-2.2.9-2.caos.src.rpm stable: + SRPMS/firefox-1.5.0.4-1.caos.src.rpm + SRPMS/openssh-4.3p2-1.caos.src.rpm + SRPMS/perl-Authen-SASL-Cyrus-0.12-1.caos.src.rpm + SRPMS/perl-RDFStore-0.42-1.caos.src.rpm + SRPMS/perl-XML-SAX-0.13-1.caos.src.rpm + SRPMS/php5-5.1.2-7.caos.src.rpm + SRPMS/postfix-2.2.10-2.caos.src.rpm + SRPMS/qingy-0.8.0-1.caos.src.rpm - SRPMS/firefox-1.5.0.3-1.caos.src.rpm - SRPMS/openssh-4.2p1-2.caos.src.rpm - SRPMS/php5-5.0.5-5.src.rpm - SRPMS/postfix-2.2.3-2.caos.src.rpm -- Greg M. Kurtzer http://runlevelzero.net/ http://caosity.org/ http://warewulf-cluster.org/ Do not look anywhere for truth, for all that is needed is to refrain from allowing concepts to arise. From slaton at OCF.Berkeley.EDU Mon Jun 19 19:53:00 2006 From: slaton at OCF.Berkeley.EDU (slaton) Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 19:53:00 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [cAos] Problems installing gridengine 5.3 Message-ID: I'm having a couple of problems installing the Grid Engine 5.3 package from repo. 1) First there is a "transaction check error" when installing the 5.3p6-8 package from yum: $ sudo yum install gridengine Setting up Install Process Setting up Repos core 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00 stable 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB 00:00 Reading repository metadata in from local files core : ################################################## 167/167 stable : ################################################## 1562/1562 Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package gridengine.x86_64 0:5.3p6-8.caos set to be updated --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: pdksh for package: gridengine --> Processing Dependency: warewulf for package: gridengine --> Processing Dependency: /bin/ksh for package: gridengine --> Restarting Dependency Resolution with new changes. --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package warewulf.x86_64 0:2.6.2-1 set to be updated --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: warewulf-tools = 2.6.2-1 for package: warewulf --> Processing Dependency: perl-Unix-Syslog for package: warewulf --> Processing Dependency: perl(Unix::Syslog) for package: warewulf --> Running transaction check Dependencies Resolved Transaction Listing: Install: gridengine.x86_64 0:5.3p6-8.caos - stable Performing the following to resolve dependencies: Install: warewulf.x86_64 0:2.6.2-1 - stable Total download size: 5.8 MB Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: (1/2): gridengine-5.3p6-8 100% |=========================| 4.5 MB 00:06 (2/2): warewulf-2.6.2-1.x 100% |=========================| 1.3 MB 00:02 Running Transaction Test Finished Transaction Test Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/man/man5/complex.5.gz from install of gridengine-5.3p6-8.caos conflicts with file from package man-pages-1.66-2 Looks like both gridengine and the basic man package include a COMPLEX(5) manpage. I don't think this is as simple as just renaming the existing (man-pages pkg) file, is it? I imagine i'd also have to edit something like a spec file used for srpms, but i'm not familiar enough with yum to know where this information is. Thanks for any suggestions. 2) Second problem has more to do with how my cluster is set up. I have a master/admin node which is responsible for booting the cluster nodes (Warewulf of course ;) and various other sundry server roles. There are no user logins on this machine. There is a second, login/interactive node which the users log into to access the cluster. So the warewulf master node has the full warewulf-package and warewulf-tools, whereas the login node only has the warewulf-tools package installed. It appears that the caos gridengine package needs to run on the warewulf master, since it's flagged as a prerequisite. However there is no separate gridengine-tools sort of package containing the user tools, correct? Therefore i don't see how my users will have access to any of the gridengine user commands. There is of course the gridengine-node package, which i've installed to VNFS -- perhaps i should have checked this to see if it includes the user programs, in which case i will just install this as well onto my login node.... Thanks for any insights... slaton Slaton Lipscomb Nogales Lab, Howard Hughes Medical Institute http://cryoem.berkeley.edu From S.walsh at nerdvana.com.au Fri Jun 23 04:45:32 2006 From: S.walsh at nerdvana.com.au (Nerdvana - Steve Walsh) Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 21:45:32 +1000 Subject: [cAos] Postfix segfaults on Caos 2.2 In-Reply-To: <20060613015302.GA18198@aries.runlevelzero.net> Message-ID: Hi Folks I've got an Intel EM64T box that exhibits the odd behaviour of Segfaulting when attempting smtp transactions. It's a standard postfix.x86_64 0:2.2.10-2 package out of the stable repository, with only very basic configuration. If I try a telnet to localhost, it fails first time, then accepts the connection for a period of time. After a certain period of time (obvious some time out value), it will exhibit the same issues. Needless to say, emails are bouncing to the box. [root at mail ~]# telnet localhost 25 Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]'. Connection closed by foreign host. [root at mail ~]# telnet localhost 25 Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]'. /var/log/messages shows the following Jun 24 04:41:15 praetorian postfix: Stopping postfix: succeeded Jun 24 04:41:15 praetorian postfix: Starting postfix: succeeded Jun 24 04:41:49 praetorian kernel: smtpd[3656]: segfault at 00002aaaaabbfdf0 rip 00002aaaaaab1191 rsp 00007ffffffc4960 error 7 /var/log/maillog shows Jun 24 04:41:15 praetorian postfix/postfix-script: starting the Postfix mail system Jun 24 04:41:15 praetorian postfix/master[3645]: daemon started -- version 2.2.10, configuration /etc/postfix Jun 24 04:41:49 praetorian postfix/master[3645]: warning: process /usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd pid 3656 killed by signal 11 Jun 24 04:41:49 praetorian postfix/master[3645]: warning: /usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd: bad command startup -- throttling I'm at a bit of a loss where to start looking. It's a very standard Caos 2.2 box with LAMP config and one or two other things, but nothing that I can see would be causing it. Hoping someone can shed some light on the matter Steve From slaton at OCF.Berkeley.EDU Fri Jun 23 13:10:42 2006 From: slaton at OCF.Berkeley.EDU (slaton) Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 13:10:42 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [cAos] Problems installing gridengine 5.3 Message-ID: (resent as list was down for a couple of days...) I'm having a couple of problems installing the Grid Engine 5.3 package from repo. 1) First there is a "transaction check error" when installing the 5.3p6-8 package from yum: $ sudo yum install gridengine Setting up Install Process Setting up Repos core 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00 stable 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB 00:00 Reading repository metadata in from local files core : ################################################## 167/167 stable : ################################################## 1562/1562 Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package gridengine.x86_64 0:5.3p6-8.caos set to be updated --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: pdksh for package: gridengine --> Processing Dependency: warewulf for package: gridengine --> Processing Dependency: /bin/ksh for package: gridengine --> Restarting Dependency Resolution with new changes. --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package warewulf.x86_64 0:2.6.2-1 set to be updated --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: warewulf-tools = 2.6.2-1 for package: warewulf --> Processing Dependency: perl-Unix-Syslog for package: warewulf --> Processing Dependency: perl(Unix::Syslog) for package: warewulf --> Running transaction check Dependencies Resolved Transaction Listing: Install: gridengine.x86_64 0:5.3p6-8.caos - stable Performing the following to resolve dependencies: Install: warewulf.x86_64 0:2.6.2-1 - stable Total download size: 5.8 MB Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: (1/2): gridengine-5.3p6-8 100% |=========================| 4.5 MB 00:06 (2/2): warewulf-2.6.2-1.x 100% |=========================| 1.3 MB 00:02 Running Transaction Test Finished Transaction Test Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/man/man5/complex.5.gz from install of gridengine-5.3p6-8.caos conflicts with file from package man-pages-1.66-2 Looks like both gridengine and the basic man package include a COMPLEX(5) manpage. I don't think this is as simple as just renaming the existing (man-pages pkg) file, is it? I imagine i'd also have to edit something like a spec file used for srpms, but i'm not familiar enough with yum to know where this information is. Thanks for any suggestions. 2) Second problem has more to do with how my cluster is set up. I have a master/admin node which is responsible for booting the cluster nodes, Warewulf of course, and a few other sundry server roles. There are no user logins on this machine. There is a second, login/interactive node which the users log into to access the cluster and also run serial jobs. So the warewulf master node has the full warewulf-package and warewulf-tools, whereas the login node only has the warewulf-tools package installed. It appears that the caos gridengine package needs to run on the warewulf master, since it's flagged as a prerequisite. However there is no separate gridengine-tools sort of package containing the user tools, correct? Therefore i don't see how my users will have access to any of the gridengine user commands. There is of course the gridengine-node package, which i've installed to VNFS -- perhaps I just need to install this on my login node as well? So there may be no problem here after all, i'm just unfamiliar with SGE. Thanks for any insights... slaton Slaton Lipscomb Nogales Lab, Howard Hughes Medical Institute http://cryoem.berkeley.edu From glen at callident.com Sun Jun 25 15:27:06 2006 From: glen at callident.com (Glen Otero) Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 15:27:06 -0700 Subject: [cAos] caos3 development In-Reply-To: <20060606202954.GA4861@aries.runlevelzero.net> References: <20060604050900.GB14645@aries.runlevelzero.net> <5FAD211E-CC25-48BA-AB6A-0478EBB10337@callident.com> <20060605202248.GB13146@aries.runlevelzero.net> <24EDB547-9533-4603-A818-0C0AE3703C53@callident.com> <20060606202954.GA4861@aries.runlevelzero.net> Message-ID: On Jun 6, 2006, at 1:29 PM, Greg M. Kurtzer wrote: > On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 06:33:14AM -0700, Glen Otero wrote: >> >> On Jun 5, 2006, at 1:22 PM, Greg M. Kurtzer wrote: >> >>> If my memory serves me right,... you just happen to be one of the >>> worlds >>> leading experts on computational genomics and bio-informatics. :) >>> >>> Lets start there if that works for you. :) >> >> Works for me. > > Excellent! :) > >>> Can you provide a list of the freely available bio-informatics code >>> that >>> you would be interested in maintaining and their dependencies >>> (eg. web >>> based frontends may require, apache2, php5, perl, python, *sql, >>> etc..). >> >> Will do. These packages aren't included in any Linux distro >> (obviously), so how will they be organized within cAos? Will groups >> of other domain-specific packages be compiled as well? > > Yes, I believe so. Can you give me an example of some of the packages > that you are curious about? EMBOSS-3.0.0-2.bio.src.rpm R-2.1.0-1.bio.src.rpm R-Bioconductor-1.6-1.bio.src.rpm R-DBI-0.1.9-3.bio.src.rpm R-Hmisc-3.0.6-2.bio.src.rpm R-RMySQL-0.5.5-2.bio.src.rpm R-acepack-1.3.2.1-5.bio.src.rpm R-gdata-2.0.7-3.bio.src.rpm R-gmodels-2.0.7-2.bio.src.rpm R-gplots-2.0.7-3.bio.src.rpm R-gregmisc-2.0.8-6.bio.src.rpm R-gtools-2.0.7-2.bio.src.rpm ViennaRNA-1.5-4.bio.src.rpm biopython-1.30-2.bio.src.rpm clustalx-1.83-5.bio.src.rpm gibbs-9.95-3.bio.src.rpm glimpse-4.18.0-1.rhfc2.bio.src.rpm grace-5.1.18-1.bio.src.rpm hmmer-2.3.2-5.bio.src.rpm libgc-6.6-0.src.rpm mafft-5.531-1.bio.src.rpm mcl-4.314-1.bio.src.rpm mfold-3.1.2-3.bio.src.rpm ncbi-toolbox-6.1.20050605-1.bio.src.rpm netcdf-3.5.1-3.bio.src.rpm paml-3.14-1.rhfc2.bio.src.rpm pdflib-lite-6.0.0p1-5.bio.src.rpm perl-AcePerl-1.87-3.bio.src.rpm perl-Bioperl-1.4-4.bio.src.rpm perl-DB_File-1.810-1.bio.src.rpm perl-Data-Stag-0.07-1.bio.src.rpm perl-Data-Table-1.42-0.bio.1.src.rpm perl-File-Temp-0.14-3.bio.src.rpm perl-Graph-0.20105-0.bio.1.src.rpm perl-Heap-0.71-0.bio.1.src.rpm perl-IO-Socket-SSL-0.96-1.bio.src.rpm perl-IO-String-1.05-3.bio.src.rpm perl-MIME-Base64-3.05-1.bio.src.rpm perl-MLDBM-2.01-1.bio.src.rpm perl-Math-Derivative-0.01-2.bio.src.rpm perl-Math-Spline-0.01-2.bio.src.rpm perl-PBS-0.19-1.bio.src.rpm perl-SOAP-Lite-0.60-2.bio.src.rpm perl-SVG-Graph-0.01-3.bio.src.rpm perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-2.11-2.bio.src.rpm perl-Statistics-Descriptive-2.6-2.bio.src.rpm perl-Text-Shellwords-1.07-2.bio.src.rpm perl-Tree-DAG_Node-1.04-2.bio.src.rpm perl-XML-LibXSLT-1.57-1.bio.src.rpm perl-tfbs-0.5.0-4.bio.src.rpm primer3-1.0.0-2.bio.src.rpm renderPM-0.99.20041122-1.bio.src.rpm reportlab-1_19-2.bio.src.rpm t-coffee-2.03-1.bio.src.rpm tdl-1.5.2-1.rhfc2.bio.src.rpm tkdiff-4.1-1.bio.src.rpm There are a few others. Glen > > Presently we use group directories and ownerships to allow some people > access to certain parts of the distro's repository. We can do the same > thing here. Maintainers for the dependencies will be decided on by > a per > case basis. > > They can be installed via predefined profiles and/or system roles. > > (does that answer your question?) > > Thanks! > > -- > Greg M. Kurtzer > http://runlevelzero.net/ > http://caosity.org/ > http://warewulf-cluster.org/ > > Do not look anywhere for truth, for all that is needed is to > refrain from > allowing concepts to arise. > _______________________________________________ > cAos mailing list > cAos at caosity.org > http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/caos > From benjamin at py-soft.co.uk Mon Jun 26 04:16:23 2006 From: benjamin at py-soft.co.uk (Benjamin Donnachie) Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:16:23 +0100 Subject: [cAos] caos3 development In-Reply-To: <20060604050900.GB14645@aries.runlevelzero.net> References: <20060604050900.GB14645@aries.runlevelzero.net> Message-ID: <449FC207.7080203@py-soft.co.uk> Greg M. Kurtzer wrote: > To accommodate this, cAos-3 primary emphasis is performance, efficiency, > services and security. Our targeted user-base is clustered systems and > servers for ISP, home and office. Secondary emphasis will include other > more general distribution aspects. What are your thoughts on SELinux? After almost falling foul of the recent coppermine vulnerability (having just patched to avoid one!), I feel that cAos-3 should incorporate it in order to meet its security goals. > Thus I am looking for people to not only volunteer but also commit to long > term maintenance of various aspects of caos3. We have some very intriguing > opportunities in-front of us and we need to be more aggressive and focused > if we are to reach the next level. Are there any updates on this? I've been distracted by other things, and other projects, but I'd like to help out. Take care, Ben From astevens at gravitypark.com Mon Jun 26 12:12:35 2006 From: astevens at gravitypark.com (Arthur Stevens) Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:12:35 -0700 Subject: [cAos] caos3 development References: <20060604050900.GB14645@aries.runlevelzero.net> <449FC207.7080203@py-soft.co.uk> Message-ID: <001001c69954$7c101850$6600a8c0@astevens> I personally would recommend not using SELinux and use openwall or grsec as well as others. Offer SELinux support, but don't cater to it from the get go. It really does not help as much as some of the other options imho. We are working on a new kernel for v3 and I think you will like the new added security options/features. We should hopefully be replacing postfix with qmail and some other security related conversions as well. Arthur ----- Original Message ----- From: "Benjamin Donnachie" To: "Community Assembled OS" Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 4:16 AM Subject: Re: [cAos] caos3 development > Greg M. Kurtzer wrote: >> To accommodate this, cAos-3 primary emphasis is performance, efficiency, >> services and security. Our targeted user-base is clustered systems and >> servers for ISP, home and office. Secondary emphasis will include other >> more general distribution aspects. > > What are your thoughts on SELinux? > > After almost falling foul of the recent coppermine vulnerability (having > just patched to avoid one!), I feel that cAos-3 should incorporate it in > order to meet its security goals. > >> Thus I am looking for people to not only volunteer but also commit to >> long >> term maintenance of various aspects of caos3. We have some very >> intriguing >> opportunities in-front of us and we need to be more aggressive and >> focused >> if we are to reach the next level. > > Are there any updates on this? I've been distracted by other things, > and other projects, but I'd like to help out. > > Take care, > > Ben > _______________________________________________ > cAos mailing list > cAos at caosity.org > http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/caos > From mej at caosity.org Mon Jun 26 13:48:24 2006 From: mej at caosity.org (Michael Jennings) Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:48:24 -0400 Subject: [cAos] Postfix segfaults on Caos 2.2 In-Reply-To: References: <20060613015302.GA18198@aries.runlevelzero.net> Message-ID: <20060626204824.GA19672@kainx.org> On Friday, 23 June 2006, at 21:45:32 (+1000), Nerdvana - Steve Walsh wrote: > I've got an Intel EM64T box that exhibits the odd behaviour of > Segfaulting when attempting smtp transactions. It's a standard > postfix.x86_64 0:2.2.10-2 package out of the stable repository, with > only very basic configuration. Have you tried rebuilding from the SRPM? Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "Don't risk more than you can afford to walk away without." -- Rule of Life #39 From S.walsh at nerdvana.com.au Mon Jun 26 14:48:20 2006 From: S.walsh at nerdvana.com.au (Nerdvana - Steve Walsh) Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 07:48:20 +1000 Subject: [cAos] Postfix segfaults on Caos 2.2 In-Reply-To: <20060626204824.GA19672@kainx.org> Message-ID: Hi Michael yes, I tried rebuilding it from the RPM on the mirror, and got yet more segfaults. I've pulled the box out of the DC and have it back in my office, so I can get more aggressive with my testing, I'll let you know what I find. -----Original Message----- From: Michael Jennings Sent: Tuesday, 27 June 2006 6:48 AM To: caos at caosity.org Subject: Re: [cAos] Postfix segfaults on Caos 2.2 On Friday, 23 June 2006, at 21:45:32 (+1000), Nerdvana - Steve Walsh wrote: > I've got an Intel EM64T box that exhibits the odd behaviour of > Segfaulting when attempting smtp transactions. It's a standard > postfix.x86_64 0:2.2.10-2 package out of the stable repository, with > only very basic configuration. Have you tried rebuilding from the SRPM? Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "Don't risk more than you can afford to walk away without." -- Rule of Life #39 _______________________________________________ cAos mailing list cAos at caosity.org http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/caos From gmk at runlevelzero.net Mon Jun 26 22:54:18 2006 From: gmk at runlevelzero.net (Greg M. Kurtzer) Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 22:54:18 -0700 Subject: [cAos] caos3 development In-Reply-To: References: <20060604050900.GB14645@aries.runlevelzero.net> <5FAD211E-CC25-48BA-AB6A-0478EBB10337@callident.com> <20060605202248.GB13146@aries.runlevelzero.net> <24EDB547-9533-4603-A818-0C0AE3703C53@callident.com> <20060606202954.GA4861@aries.runlevelzero.net> Message-ID: <20060627055418.GA2054@aries.runlevelzero.net> Are you thinking these would binary packages or in the ports tree? Main diff is binary packages would be pretty much locked down to just gcc, and the ports tree would enable multiple compilers and underlying libs to be optimized. On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 03:27:06PM -0700, Glen Otero wrote: > > On Jun 6, 2006, at 1:29 PM, Greg M. Kurtzer wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 06:33:14AM -0700, Glen Otero wrote: > >> > >> On Jun 5, 2006, at 1:22 PM, Greg M. Kurtzer wrote: > >> > >>> If my memory serves me right,... you just happen to be one of the > >>> worlds > >>> leading experts on computational genomics and bio-informatics. :) > >>> > >>> Lets start there if that works for you. :) > >> > >> Works for me. > > > > Excellent! :) > > > >>> Can you provide a list of the freely available bio-informatics code > >>> that > >>> you would be interested in maintaining and their dependencies > >>> (eg. web > >>> based frontends may require, apache2, php5, perl, python, *sql, > >>> etc..). > >> > >> Will do. These packages aren't included in any Linux distro > >> (obviously), so how will they be organized within cAos? Will groups > >> of other domain-specific packages be compiled as well? > > > > Yes, I believe so. Can you give me an example of some of the packages > > that you are curious about? > > EMBOSS-3.0.0-2.bio.src.rpm > R-2.1.0-1.bio.src.rpm > R-Bioconductor-1.6-1.bio.src.rpm > R-DBI-0.1.9-3.bio.src.rpm > R-Hmisc-3.0.6-2.bio.src.rpm > R-RMySQL-0.5.5-2.bio.src.rpm > R-acepack-1.3.2.1-5.bio.src.rpm > R-gdata-2.0.7-3.bio.src.rpm > R-gmodels-2.0.7-2.bio.src.rpm > R-gplots-2.0.7-3.bio.src.rpm > R-gregmisc-2.0.8-6.bio.src.rpm > R-gtools-2.0.7-2.bio.src.rpm > ViennaRNA-1.5-4.bio.src.rpm > biopython-1.30-2.bio.src.rpm > clustalx-1.83-5.bio.src.rpm > gibbs-9.95-3.bio.src.rpm > glimpse-4.18.0-1.rhfc2.bio.src.rpm > grace-5.1.18-1.bio.src.rpm > hmmer-2.3.2-5.bio.src.rpm > libgc-6.6-0.src.rpm > mafft-5.531-1.bio.src.rpm > mcl-4.314-1.bio.src.rpm > mfold-3.1.2-3.bio.src.rpm > ncbi-toolbox-6.1.20050605-1.bio.src.rpm > netcdf-3.5.1-3.bio.src.rpm > paml-3.14-1.rhfc2.bio.src.rpm > pdflib-lite-6.0.0p1-5.bio.src.rpm > perl-AcePerl-1.87-3.bio.src.rpm > perl-Bioperl-1.4-4.bio.src.rpm > perl-DB_File-1.810-1.bio.src.rpm > perl-Data-Stag-0.07-1.bio.src.rpm > perl-Data-Table-1.42-0.bio.1.src.rpm > perl-File-Temp-0.14-3.bio.src.rpm > perl-Graph-0.20105-0.bio.1.src.rpm > perl-Heap-0.71-0.bio.1.src.rpm > perl-IO-Socket-SSL-0.96-1.bio.src.rpm > perl-IO-String-1.05-3.bio.src.rpm > perl-MIME-Base64-3.05-1.bio.src.rpm > perl-MLDBM-2.01-1.bio.src.rpm > perl-Math-Derivative-0.01-2.bio.src.rpm > perl-Math-Spline-0.01-2.bio.src.rpm > perl-PBS-0.19-1.bio.src.rpm > perl-SOAP-Lite-0.60-2.bio.src.rpm > perl-SVG-Graph-0.01-3.bio.src.rpm > perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-2.11-2.bio.src.rpm > perl-Statistics-Descriptive-2.6-2.bio.src.rpm > perl-Text-Shellwords-1.07-2.bio.src.rpm > perl-Tree-DAG_Node-1.04-2.bio.src.rpm > perl-XML-LibXSLT-1.57-1.bio.src.rpm > perl-tfbs-0.5.0-4.bio.src.rpm > primer3-1.0.0-2.bio.src.rpm > renderPM-0.99.20041122-1.bio.src.rpm > reportlab-1_19-2.bio.src.rpm > t-coffee-2.03-1.bio.src.rpm > tdl-1.5.2-1.rhfc2.bio.src.rpm > tkdiff-4.1-1.bio.src.rpm > > There are a few others. > > Glen > > > > > > Presently we use group directories and ownerships to allow some people > > access to certain parts of the distro's repository. We can do the same > > thing here. Maintainers for the dependencies will be decided on by > > a per > > case basis. > > > > They can be installed via predefined profiles and/or system roles. > > > > (does that answer your question?) > > > > Thanks! > > > > -- > > Greg M. Kurtzer > > http://runlevelzero.net/ > > http://caosity.org/ > > http://warewulf-cluster.org/ > > > > Do not look anywhere for truth, for all that is needed is to > > refrain from > > allowing concepts to arise. > > _______________________________________________ > > cAos mailing list > > cAos at caosity.org > > http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/caos > > > > _______________________________________________ > cAos mailing list > cAos at caosity.org > http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/caos -- Greg M. Kurtzer http://runlevelzero.net/ http://caosity.org/ http://warewulf-cluster.org/ Do not look anywhere for truth, for all that is needed is to refrain from allowing concepts to arise. From benjamin at py-soft.co.uk Mon Jun 26 23:10:55 2006 From: benjamin at py-soft.co.uk (Benjamin Donnachie) Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 07:10:55 +0100 Subject: [cAos] caos3 development Message-ID: <44A0CBEF.2090004@py-soft.co.uk> Arthur Stevens wrote: >We are working on a new kernel for v3 and I think you will like the new >added security options/features. We should hopefully be replacing postfix >with qmail and some other security related conversions as well. Sounds interesting... I've been distracted with other projects lately, but please let me know if I can help. Take care, Ben From gmk at runlevelzero.net Tue Jun 27 06:11:15 2006 From: gmk at runlevelzero.net (Greg M. Kurtzer) Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 06:11:15 -0700 Subject: [cAos] Problems installing gridengine 5.3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20060627131115.GB2054@aries.runlevelzero.net> On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 07:53:00PM -0700, slaton wrote: > I'm having a couple of problems installing the Grid Engine 5.3 package > from repo. ... > Looks like both gridengine and the basic man package include a COMPLEX(5) > manpage. I don't think this is as simple as just renaming the existing > (man-pages pkg) file, is it? I imagine i'd also have to edit something > like a spec file used for srpms, but i'm not familiar enough with yum to > know where this information is. Thanks for any suggestions. This would require a modification to the SPEC file for the gridengine. I will look into it. for now, you can quickly work around the problem by locating the downloaded binary RPM in /var/cache/yum/*/packages/*.rpm and installing by hand with RPM (rpm -ivh --force /path/to/package.rpm). > 2) Second problem has more to do with how my cluster is set up. I have a > master/admin node which is responsible for booting the cluster nodes > (Warewulf of course ;) and various other sundry server roles. There are no > user logins on this machine. There is a second, login/interactive node > which the users log into to access the cluster. So the warewulf master > node has the full warewulf-package and warewulf-tools, whereas the login > node only has the warewulf-tools package installed. > > It appears that the caos gridengine package needs to run on the warewulf > master, since it's flagged as a prerequisite. However there is no separate > gridengine-tools sort of package containing the user tools, correct? > Therefore i don't see how my users will have access to any of the > gridengine user commands. There is of course the gridengine-node package, > which i've installed to VNFS -- perhaps i should have checked this to see > if it includes the user programs, in which case i will just install this > as well onto my login node.... If I understand the problem correctly, the best thing to do is to mount /sge via NFS onto your interactive nodes and set the appropriate paths and setup the login node as a submit host. > Thanks for any insights... Hope it helps! -- Greg M. Kurtzer http://runlevelzero.net/ http://caosity.org/ http://warewulf-cluster.org/ Do not look anywhere for truth, for all that is needed is to refrain from allowing concepts to arise. From benjamin at py-soft.co.uk Thu Jun 29 09:46:55 2006 From: benjamin at py-soft.co.uk (Benjamin Donnachie) Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 17:46:55 +0100 Subject: [cAos] caos3 development In-Reply-To: <20060604050900.GB14645@aries.runlevelzero.net> References: <20060604050900.GB14645@aries.runlevelzero.net> Message-ID: <44A403FF.9040306@py-soft.co.uk> Greg M. Kurtzer wrote: > To accommodate this, cAos-3 primary emphasis is performance, efficiency, > services and security. Our targeted user-base is clustered systems and > servers for ISP, home and office. I just thought - are there any plans to incorporate the hardened php patches from http://www.hardened-php.net ? Take care, Ben From astevens at gravitypark.com Thu Jun 29 10:28:50 2006 From: astevens at gravitypark.com (Arthur Stevens) Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 10:28:50 -0700 Subject: [cAos] caos3 development References: <20060604050900.GB14645@aries.runlevelzero.net> <44A403FF.9040306@py-soft.co.uk> Message-ID: <000c01c69ba1$7cecee20$6600a8c0@astevens> I am currently testing it. Have you used it much by chance? Arthur (astevens) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Benjamin Donnachie" To: "Community Assembled OS" Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 9:46 AM Subject: Re: [cAos] caos3 development > Greg M. Kurtzer wrote: >> To accommodate this, cAos-3 primary emphasis is performance, efficiency, >> services and security. Our targeted user-base is clustered systems and >> servers for ISP, home and office. > > I just thought - are there any plans to incorporate the hardened php > patches from http://www.hardened-php.net ? > > Take care, > > Ben > _______________________________________________ > cAos mailing list > cAos at caosity.org > http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/caos > From benjamin at py-soft.co.uk Thu Jun 29 11:15:37 2006 From: benjamin at py-soft.co.uk (Benjamin Donnachie) Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:15:37 +0100 Subject: [cAos] caos3 development In-Reply-To: <000c01c69ba1$7cecee20$6600a8c0@astevens> References: <20060604050900.GB14645@aries.runlevelzero.net> <44A403FF.9040306@py-soft.co.uk> <000c01c69ba1$7cecee20$6600a8c0@astevens> Message-ID: <44A418C9.6000403@py-soft.co.uk> Arthur Stevens wrote: > I am currently testing it. Have you used it much by chance? I'm currently testing it too along with suPHP from http://www.suphp.org/, which also looks promising. I'll let you know how it goes! :) Ben From slaton at OCF.Berkeley.EDU Thu Jun 29 14:04:14 2006 From: slaton at OCF.Berkeley.EDU (slaton) Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 14:04:14 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [cAos] Problems installing gridengine 5.3 In-Reply-To: <20060627131115.GB2054@aries.runlevelzero.net> References: <20060627131115.GB2054@aries.runlevelzero.net> Message-ID: > > Looks like both gridengine and the basic man package include a > > COMPLEX(5) manpage. I don't think this is as simple as just renaming > > the existing (man-pages pkg) file, is it? I imagine i'd also have to > > edit something like a spec file used for srpms, but i'm not familiar > > enough with yum to know where this information is. Thanks for any > > suggestions. > > This would require a modification to the SPEC file for the gridengine. I > will look into it. for now, you can quickly work around the problem by > locating the downloaded binary RPM in /var/cache/yum/*/packages/*.rpm > and installing by hand with RPM (rpm -ivh --force /path/to/package.rpm). Thanks Greg. After (forced) install, the gridengine processes automatically started, then immediately bailed: Starting the SGE processes gethostbyname() failed: Resource temporarily unavailable gethostbyname() failed: Resource temporarily unavailable /etc/rc.d/init.d/rcsge: line 172: [: =: unary operator expected critical error: unrecoverable error - contact systems manager /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.25302: line 63: 28663 Aborted (core dumped) qconf -Ac host /var/spool/gridengine/default/qmaster/complexes/host critical error: unrecoverable error - contact systems manager /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.25302: line 64: 28664 Aborted (core dumped) qconf -Ac queue /var/spool/gridengine/default/qmaster/complexes/queue critical error: unrecoverable error - contact systems manager /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.25302: line 65: 28665 Aborted (core dumped) qconf -as $HOSTNAME Don't forget to add /sge to the /etc/exports for your sharedfs networ Ouch. Apparently gridengine expects to run on a machine with internet access. :) I expect there is a workaround, no worries. > > It appears that the caos gridengine package needs to run on the > > warewulf master, since it's flagged as a prerequisite. However there > > is no separate gridengine-tools sort of package containing the user > > tools, correct? Therefore i don't see how my users will have access to > > any of the gridengine user commands. There is of course the > > gridengine-node package, which i've installed to VNFS -- perhaps i > > should have checked this to see if it includes the user programs, in > > which case i will just install this as well onto my login node.... > > If I understand the problem correctly, the best thing to do is to mount > /sge via NFS onto your interactive nodes and set the appropriate paths > and setup the login node as a submit host. Understood....thanks. slaton